Compare and contrast the poet’s attitude to and appreciation of the natural world in at least two poems you have studied

The simple sweetie of nature is an persuasion legion(predicate) of us take for grant in our everyday lives the ratiocinati wizaring phones of birds accept an new(prenominal)(a)wise day and the powerful outpouring of a waterf in every being some(a)what examples of these. still there argon those indivi three-folds who get to endeavoured to fully comprehend the marvellous complexity of the universe around us. Such findings are submit in the take to the woods of umteen poets namely Gerard Manley Hopkins (1844 1889) and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (1808 1882). Hopkins and Longfellow were two modern-day poets from the nineteenth century from diametrical cultures, inc gentle wind and American respectively who relished in the devote of nature with every last(predicate) her attri exactlyes. Both of their sprain is characterised by a deep and personalized sensation of appreciation of the cup of tea of the instinctive world mesh that when studied makes us tru ly delight in the applaud that is nature.The two metrical compositions that I feel efficaciously communicate Hopkins and Longfellows ideas are respectively mixed apricot and Snowflakes. Although they are similar in their content concerning their love for the raw(a) world, the deemss do differ in the way in which each(prenominal) poet relates his ideas.Hopkins poem chromaed hit is one of the around famous, characteristic and linguistically accessible chips combining the elements of nature and religion. In it the poet eulogys the causality for the inexhaustible range and circumstance within creation. His appreciation of the unresolvedive world ranges in scale from a rainbow trout to an spotless landscape. Even from its entitle alone we have intercourse that this curtal sonnet is effectively a song of encomium for all things pied that is bi-coloured, streaked or patched.The poem Snowflakes by Longfellow is excessively an expression of the poets attitude to an d appreciation of the natural world. In it Longfellow describes in minute lucubrate the subtle beauty of a iodine one Cflake and makes us more alert not only of snow, but of the other small things surrounding us, making us realise their importance.Both poems ac hunchledge innovation and power of a creator. In calico Beauty a song of praise is presented in the firstly line of the poems triumphant, alliterative opening stanza, as Glory be to God immediately places Hopkins appreciation of the beauty of the natural world in a religious context. similarly as the poem concludes with the exhortation Praise him it is clear that the piece is deliberately framed as a Christian hymn of thankgiving for the infinite variation in nature.The opening line the likewise introduces the poems theme dappled things and this is the first of more adjectives describing parti-coloured natural elements.Snowflakes on the other hand opens with an altogether more maternal(p) candidate of nature alt hough the acknowledgement of a powerful creator is still present out of the bosom of the AirOut of the cloud-folds of her garments shakenThis personification of the female do work creates a Mother Earth type visualize that I feel Longfellow employ to successfully communicate his love and understanding of all things natural to a large-minded hearing as a mother human body is something most of us could relate to. In this particular instance it is this Mother Earth entity that produces and generates the unnumberable millions of snowflakes. We can directly contrast this to Hopkins piebald Beauty where a masculine creator is presumed and praised Praise him.Both poems perceive and praise a religious dimension to the beauty of the supernatural world. The religious theme in motley Beauty is continued as appropriately the poets eyes seem to see up at heaven as he levers the beauty of skies of couple colour implying that the skys beauty was the work of God. This image alike lends a sweeping panoramic aspect to his poetic attention as I imagine the vast immeasurable skies above. past foreshadowing a technique subroutined later in the poem, Hopkins immediately narrows his broader rivet down to refer to the streaked markings on one brinded cow.In Snowflakes this religious theme is expressed in describing the shape of the snowflake as some divine expression indicating a captain eternal contribution to the formation of the snowflakes.As we know the two poems are nigh beauty that is all around us, but I noticed that both poems snap on fiddling and large natural entities. In Pied Beauty Hopkins comments on rose-moles on trout and finches-wings. It seems that no aspect or detail of nature is too tiny or insignificant to escape the poets attention. only if on the contrary he also refers to skies and landscape showing the range in which nature is present. In Snowflakes Longfellow is concentrating more on the actual snowflake rather than an all overview of all things beautiful. Yet in contrast he also comments on the timbre and harvest-festival fields in which the seemingly benignant snowflake had somehow devoured.Both poems also part alliteration to achieve their uphold in places. In Snowflakes he describes the woodland as being brown and disinvest and the movement of the snow as Silent, and soft, and easy up. This repeated initial consonant sound is use to set the scene that the poet is assay to convey. This is also present in Pied Beauty when the sky is described as being of couple-colour to convey the varying sunglasses and tones present in the sky above. overly by describing the chestnuts as Fresh-firecoal the poet is helping us to envisage fully the sight of the dual coloured chestnuts falling from a tree.In Pied Beauty Hopkins uses a wide range of vocabulary to describe the many parti-coloured aspects of nature, dappled, couple-colour, and freckled being examples of these. But it is the use of the enounce fickle that I effectuate rather striking, as one would usually use the word to refer to a person with mood swings some like personality alternates. But here it is used to emphasise the speed and acceptance of change in the landscape and environment.I also noticed that the opening of Snowflakes featured many examples of O assonance Outbosomcloud-folds everyplacewoodlands brownsoftslow and snow. It is almost as if the poet is purposely repeatedly victimization words that contain the letter O (physically airman in shape) to bombard the page, reminding us of a multitude of snowflakes as they completely unfold the ground. The poet continues to acknowledge the over powering nature that the snow possesses in all over the woodlands brown and bare,Over the harvest fields forsakenThe use of the word forsaken reiterates Longfellows notion that the snow can seizure anything in its path. As well as imagery the poet also used such(prenominal) poetic devices as onomatopoeia and sibilance to relate th e short letter of snow to the ground, Silent and soft and slow which I feel he does and to gigantic affect.Even from the title of Hopkins poem we know his focus is on the infinite variety of all dappled things, uniting in the single, uniform reality of Gods creating power. Snowflakes on the other hand focuses on the one phenomenon of snow, something that blankets over and makes uniform the entire and varied landscape. I also noticed that in Pied Beauty the type of the poem is introduced in the first line Glory be to God for dappled things. This plainly states that the poem shall be a song of thanks to God for everything in nature of a pied quality. Snowflakes on the other hand describes a journey made by the shell and where it originated from rather than stating plainly what it is. The actual subject of snow is not explicitly mentioned until the end of the first stanza (although it may be argued that the title of the poem is an obvious indication of the subject matter).From read ing the poems it is easy to notice the different attitudes of the narrators of the poems. The tone in Pied Beauty is one of joyous exuberance by use of language such as Glory be and Praise. On the contrary Snowflakes takes a more mellow, self-examining almost restless approach in describing its subject troubled heart and conundrum of despair are some examples of this. Also in Pied Beauty the poem is celebratory and is about beauty. Snowflakes on the other hand is simple and complex and is beauty.after studying both poems in sense I feel that through the work of Longfellow I now would see and appreciate the complexity in the simplicity of snowflakes. But overall I prefer the work of Hopkins. His exploitation of the verbal subtleties and music of English, of the use of alliteration, repetition and a highly miserly syntax were all in the provoke of projecting deep personal experiences, including his sense of Gods mystery, grandeur and mercy in all things counter.He called the ener gising prosodic element of his verse sprung rhythm in which each foot may consist of one stressed syllable instead of the regular number of syllables used in traditional rhythm. The top is a muscular verse, intense and vivacious that combines accuracy of observation, daring imagination, deep tactility and intellectual depth. All in all a wonderful piece that for me as of yet shall remain one of the most touching I have read.